Despite the abundance of evidence supporting the existence of cycles in various aspects of life, a segment of the population remains steadfast in their refusal to acknowledge their existence. These individuals persistently reject the concept of cycles, regardless of the empirical data or logical arguments presented. This resistance is rooted in cognitive biases, psychological factors, and philosophical beliefs.

One prominent reason for this disbelief in cycles is the human tendency to perceive events as isolated incidents rather than interconnected occurrences forming a cyclical pattern. This narrow perspective often prevents individuals from recognizing recurring trends or patterns, leading them to dismiss the notion of cycles altogether. Additionally, some people may feel uncomfortable with the idea of predictability implied by cycles, preferring to perceive the world as chaotic and unpredictable.

Psychological factors also play a significant role in shaping individuals’ beliefs about cycles. Confirmation bias, for instance, causes people to selectively interpret information in a way that confirms their existing beliefs while disregarding contradictory evidence. Consequently, individuals who do not believe in cycles may actively seek information supporting their skepticism while discounting any evidence to the contrary. Similarly, cognitive dissonance theory suggests that people reject ideas that conflict with their beliefs to maintain psychological consistency. As a result, those who have long believed that the world operates in a linear fashion may resist accepting evidence that suggests otherwise, such as the presence of cyclical patterns.

Moreover, cultural and philosophical perspectives can influence individuals’ attitudes toward cycles. In cultures that prioritize progress and linear advancement, the idea of cyclical patterns may be viewed as regressive or fatalistic, undermining the narrative of continuous improvement and growth. Additionally, specific philosophical frameworks, such as existentialism, emphasize individual agency and the absence of inherent meaning or purpose in the universe, making it difficult for adherents to accept the concept of cyclical patterns that imply a predetermined order or directionality to events.

In conclusion, the refusal to believe in cycles is a complex phenomenon shaped by cognitive biases, psychological mechanisms, and cultural influences. Despite the overwhelming evidence supporting their existence, there will always be individuals who remain skeptical, clinging to their belief in linear progress or chaotic randomness. Understanding the underlying factors driving this disbelief is essential for fostering open-mindedness and facilitating constructive dialogue about the nature of reality and the patterns that govern it.

Join substack

Receive in depth regular articles and musings from Joseph